# Specification Quality Checklist: Fix K-1 PDF Parser

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2025-07-21
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- All items pass validation. Specification is ready for `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`.
- The spec references "position coordinates" and "font discrimination" in the Background section as domain concepts (how K-1 PDFs work), not as implementation instructions. This is intentional — it describes the problem domain, not the solution approach.
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers exist — reasonable defaults were applied for all decisions based on the user's detailed field mapping and explicit guidance.