ghostfolio/specs/003-portfolio-performance-views/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Portfolio Performance Views

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-16 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
• Focused on user value and business needs
• Written for non-technical stakeholders
• All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Success criteria are measurable
• Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
• All acceptance scenarios are defined
• Edge cases are identified
• Scope is clearly bounded
• Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• User scenarios cover primary flows
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

• All items pass validation. The spec references existing data model entity names (Entity, Partnership, etc.) for clarity but does not prescribe implementation approach.
• The "Computed Metrics" section documents calculation formulas at a business-logic level without specifying technology.
• The Assumptions section documents reasonable defaults for ambiguous areas (asset class mapping, valuation year default, GL reference handling, enum mapping for missing asset classes).